Alan Moore’s graphic novel “Light of They Countenance” was pretty entertaining. Early on it was difficult to tell who the narrator was, but it became clear at the story progressed. Although some people may disagree, I definitely think this graphic novel should be considered literature. When reading the words, one gets a definite feeling that Moore is writing more of an epic poem than a graphic novel. Typically in graphic novels and comics there are multiple characters, action scenes, and content tailoring to more of an adolescent male. However in this instance Moore’s writing seems to flow in a more elongated way, making it have that more traditional literature feel. That being said, even if “Light of Thy Countenance” was not written in a more prose-y manner, I would still consider it to be literature.
When defining literature, one cannot be too picky. As newer, more popular methods of writing come into existence who is to judge whether or not they should be considered literary works or not? Dictionary.com defines literature as “writings in which expression and form, in connection with ideas of permanent and universal interest, are characteristic or essential features, as poetry, novels, history, biography, and essays.” If we take this definition to be true, then graphic novels can be considered literary works. Expression and form are evident in comics such as Spider-Man, Superman, and Batman, where similar themes make them fun and exciting reads. Comics also have their own form; although it may not follow the conventions of any other form of literature, it still has form and therefore fits the definition of literature. Like other forms of writing, graphic novels had to invent their own form in order to make their own unique genre. While some critics may stick to old traditions and claim that it lacks form and whatnot, if they think back other forms of literature must have had the same arguments, yet now they are the accepted standards of what literature is.
No comments:
Post a Comment